Search a drug... |
Top Searches... |
|
|
| Five Ways to Keep BPA Out of Your Food and Your Body |
| BPA—or Bisphenol A—is a highly ubiquitous chemical compound that mimics estrogen and is found in polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resin. Studies confirm BPA is chemically similar to Diethylstilbestrol, a synthetic estrogen linked to the development of vaginal cancer in the daughters of women who took the drug in the 1950s-1960s to prevent miscarriage. BPA has been in commercial use since the 1950s and is found in a wide variety of everyday items including water bottles, food and drink packaging and can linings, dental sealants, CDs and DVDs, eyeglasses, and automobiles. Most experts agree BPA is disruptive to the body’s hormonal system; scientists disagree over what dosage is harmful. Over six billion pounds of BPA are produced in the US annually by Dow Chemical, BASF, Bayer, and others and over 95 percent of Americans test positive for BPA in their urine.
BPA has been linked to prostate and breast cancers; behavioral disorders; reproductive and neurological problems; neural and behavioral effects in fetuses, infants, and children; and early onset for female puberty. Most recently, we reported on a study that linked BPA to diabetes, heart disease, and liver enzyme abnormalities. Meanwhile, last year, the Environmental Working Group conducted an analysis of BPA in canned foods and found the amount varies depending on the food: Condensed milk has relatively little BPA; infant formula contains much more at about one-fifth the safe dose limit set by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Risks are also dependent on consumption amounts. While canned soda has less BPA per serving than some other foods, people tend to drink more than one can every now and then.
With studies confirming BPA’s danger to humans and the controversy mounting, there are some steps consumers can take to help avoid ingesting the toxic chemical that seems to be virtually everywhere and in everything.
|
![]() |
| STUDY SUGGESTS THAT DISEASES CAUSED BY SOME TOXINS MAY BE PASSED DOWN THROUGH SEVERAL GENERATIONS |
| In studies involving the drug Diethylstilbestrol (DES), the scientific community was compelled to acknowledge the very real possibility that toxic exposure could have trans-generational effects. DES was a synthetic estrogen, manufactured by a number of pharmaceutical companies between the 1940s and 1970s designed to prevent miscarriages. Unfortunately, the drug has had a devastating effect on the female offspring (and possibly even the grandchildren) of women who took DES. Cancer, infertility, and other permanent injuries have been linked to DES. There is also growing suspicion that DES may also have had adverse effects on male children of DES mothers. Now, an animal (rat) study published in the journal Science has produced evidence that certain toxins may poison and pass diseases down for up to four generations. The researchers from Washington State University (led by Dr. Michael Skinner) exposed pregnant rats to a commonly used vineyard fungicide (vinclozolin) and a pesticide (methoxycchlor) during the period when the sex of the offspring was being determined. The exposed rats produced male offspring with low sperm counts and impaired fertility. When these offspring were mated with healthy females, the male offspring had the same problems. This pattern persisted through at least four generations and affected over 90% of the male offspring in each of those generations. Dr. Skinner believes diseases like breast and prostate cancer, which are becoming more common, may be linked to similar trans-generational toxic exposure. It may also mean that exposure to environmental toxins may play an important role in the evolutionary process itself. Since the levels of toxic exposure in the study were very high, the extent to which the effect may be concentration related is unclear. Thus, research needs to be done with much lower doses. Nonetheless, Dr. Skinner sees the study as "a new way to think about disease." |